| |
|
Newsletter Articles - 2006
| |
|
|
|
|
Subscriptions
Our newsletter is sent free to any address in North America. To
subscribe, add your name to our mailing list. |
|
Spring 2006
Two Little Words
In 1803, before the Unitarian denomination existed, the Universalist
denomination began its self-description ("The Winchester Profession")
as follows:
We believe that the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments
contain a revelation of the character of God and of the duty,
interest and final destination of [hu]mankind.
Does that sound like anything you could identify with? I admit
that it did not sound like anything I could identify with--not at
first. But then I noticed two little words--two little words that
said: Yes, indeed, this was written by a religious ancestor.
One of these words is the smallest one: "a." We believe
that the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments contain a
revelation…. Not the (unique) revelation,
but a revelation. One revelation among many. Our
Judeo-Christian religious tradition isn't the only religious tradition.
There are others, and they are valid, too. In some situations they
may even be more valid. When I have a religious question that Judeo-Christianity
doesn’t seem to answer very well, I might find an answer in
Buddhism, or the spirituality of Native Americans, or in some other
religious tradition.
Beginning to sound familiar?
The other word I noticed is inconspicuous, too: "contain."
[T]he Holy Scriptures … contain a revelation….
The Bible itself is not a revelation, it contains a revelation.
Some parts of the Bible are religiously important, but other parts
are not. How can these parts be distinguished? By people, using
their hearts and minds. It's we who are the final arbiters of what's
religiously important and what is not.
Doesn't this sound like today's UUism?
|
 |
|
Winter2006
The New "Flaming Birdbath"
We know a woman with a very Irish name--we'll call her Kerry O'Malley--who
identifies strongly with her Irish heritage. She wears Celtic-knot
jewelry. She has vacationed in County Kerry--her grandfather O'Malley's
birthplace--several times, and has learned to speak a little Irish.
She even has a small shamrock tattooed on one shoulder.
Kerry is three-quarters Hispanic! Yet she has never visited Puerto
Rico, the birthplace of her other three grandparents. She speaks
no Spanish.
We are
reminded of Kerry by the new UUA logo. The flaming chalice--alas,
still looking more like a birdbath than a drinking vessel--is now
in the center and surrounded by rays. This, the logo says, represents
our faith.
But the flaming chalice was used before the UUA was formed as
a symbol of Unitarianism. The UUA's previous logo, for all its problems,
at least made an attempt--by placing the chalice off-center--to
acknowledge that our heritage is more than Unitarianism alone. The
new logo says simply: we're Unitarian. It's like Kerry's shamrock
saying: I'm Irish.
But Kerry is mostly something else, and UUism is too. In The Premise
and the Promise, a history of UUism published in 2001 by the UUA,
Warren Ross writes (p. 190),
Universalism won. Though the Universalists were the weaker partner
at the beginning, Un versalism "won" in the long run--not
in the sense of power, but because Unitarian Universalist values
today are closer to historic Universalism than of Unitarianism.
It's true. Today's UUs are predominantly middle-class come-outers
whose favorite principles are the first (the inherent worth of every
person) and seventh (the interdependent web of all existence).
The analogy between the flaming chalice and Kerry's tattoo breaks
down in that Kerry can explain why the shamrock is a symbol of Ireland
in a way that is simple and easy to remember. But the explantion
of the flaming chalice on the UUA website offers no fewer than ten
possible meanings, then concludes that
There is no one offical meaning of the flaming chalice. Like
our faith, it stands open to new and ongoing interpretation and
significance.
It occurs to us that a symbol whose meaning is so varied and fluid
actually might mean very little.
|
 |
|
Winter 2006
"Denial Is Not Just a River in Egypt"
Why would smart people like UUs become devoted to a symbol of uncertain
meaning that obscures what is apparently the more important part
of their heritage?
Kerry looks Hispanic, not Irish. Hispanic genes "won."
Yet she downplays her Puerto Rican heritage because of personal
history--she grew up at a time, and in a place, where it was much
more difficult to be proud of being Puerto Rican than of being Irish.
The UU movement is likewise affected by personal history--that
of the majority of UUs who have unresolved conflicts with Christianity.
UUs may like a lot of things about Universalism, but Universalism
itself must be made to disappear because it makes a specific demand
that most UUs can't abide: that the UU movement maintain contact
with its Judeo-Christian roots.
The previous
UUA logo can be understood as a combination of the flaming chalice
and Universalism's off-center cross. The cross in the circle was
replaced by the chalice, then moved to the other side. Though the
resulting meaning was absurd--relativized Unitarianism?!--the important
thing was to get rid of that cross.
Universalists agree that mainstream Christianity has been corrupted
by theological nonsense, lust for power, sexism and anti-Semitism
(to name only some of its problems). But--like it or not--Christianity
is the only heritage UUism has, historically, and the only religious
tradition that preserves (some of) the words and deeds of the world-class
religious genius Jesus of Nazareth.
Most UUs who shun a Christian background do so because they don't
know how to separate Christanity's toxic components from elements
that could still nourish them. As a result they're always spiritually
hungry, suckers for the latest spiritual fad--and then, still hungry,
for the fad after that.
The 1780 Massachusetts Constitution, written by Unitarian John
Adams, refers to ministers as "public Protestant teachers of
piety, morality, and religion." We of the New Massachusetts
Universalist Convention call on UU ministers--and, recognizing that
it can be hard for old dogs to learn new tricks, we especially call
on UU seminarians--to recommit themselves to their role as teachers.
Teachers shape tastes and do not merely accomodate them
("God and Jesus make your neck crawl because of experience
in another church? OK, we'll drop them"). It is not difficult
to learn to disentangle our Judeo-Christian roots from the poison
and nonsense that threaten to suffocate them, and we suggest that
ministers owe it to the UU movement to learn to do this and to pass
on their skill to their congregations.
|
 |
|
Winter 2006
Suggestion to Persons Entering Heaven
--Mark Twain
Leave your dog outside. Heaven goes by favor.
If it went by merit, you would stay out
and the dog would go in.
|
 |
|
|